Scott Weinberg over at Cinematical is in a bit of a huff over the term “Splat Pack”, supposedly used to group together a number of the newest breed of horror directors. I must not read enough mainstream publications, because though Scott has seen the phrase used multiple times, I’m pretty sure this is my first time hearing about it. Some horror blogger I turned out to be.
According to a Time magazine article linked to by the Cinematical post, the Splat Pack is comprised of Rob Zombie, James Wan, Leigh Whannell, Eli Roth, Neil Marshall, and Alexandre Aja. Scott makes his case for why this artificial grouping of filmmakers is idiotic.
The common themes among the Splat Packers are … what? They all like horror movies, they don’t shy away from intense chills, harsh themes or copious gore, and they’re all carbon-based life forms, I guess. But really: Does anyone out there think the work of Eli Roth is even remotely similar to that of Neil Marshall? Does a Rob Zombie flick remind you of what was seen in, say, High Tension? I mean, if you’re going to define a term, then define it. And as a big fan of just about all these movies, I just gotta scratch my head when I hear these guys lumped together in one basket.
Maybe I’m just inured to the ways of the media, but I can’t say that I’m all that upset over this. Unlike most people who have commented on this moniker, I can see a reason why there is an attempt to group some of the latest horror filmmakers together. The people who comprise “The Splat Pack” are, at least for now, directors who have not only had a fair amount of commerical success (and some critical) for their work, but seem to be happy to continue plying their trade within the genre in spite of this success. When was the last time a group of horror filmmakers emerged that had that level of committment, or the skill or luck to continue making theatrical films without getting sidetracked?