<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Horror Roundtable Week Eighty-Four</title>
	<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/</link>
	<description>Better Living Through Terror</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75439</link>
		<author>Andrew</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 05:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75439</guid>
					<description>1970s! 

In particular the lower-budget offerings crossed so many subgenres of horror. There were satanic/witchcraft paranoia pictures, such as my personal favorite, RACE WITH THE DEVIL, insane biker movies like THE WILD RIDERS, and WEREWOLVES ON WHEELS, all the great mondo-style jungle sleaze out of Italy. Then there were the wacky mutant animal pictures, such as NIGHT OF THE LEPUS and FOOD OF THE GODS. 

To men, watching a grainy 70s flick is like a warm blanket... It's just something comforting about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1970s! </p>
<p>In particular the lower-budget offerings crossed so many subgenres of horror. There were satanic/witchcraft paranoia pictures, such as my personal favorite, RACE WITH THE DEVIL, insane biker movies like THE WILD RIDERS, and WEREWOLVES ON WHEELS, all the great mondo-style jungle sleaze out of Italy. Then there were the wacky mutant animal pictures, such as NIGHT OF THE LEPUS and FOOD OF THE GODS. </p>
<p>To men, watching a grainy 70s flick is like a warm blanket&#8230; It&#8217;s just something comforting about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Fournier</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75473</link>
		<author>Pierre Fournier</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75473</guid>
					<description>Am I the only one? Hammer, 60s, is my comfort zone. I grew up loving the Universals on TV, and seeing the Hammer double-bills as they came out was the perfect next step. Great atmosphere, wonderful sets, beautifully shot. A little blood, Peter Cushing’s weapon-like cheekbones, and oceans of cleavage. I also liked the Italian gothics of the era, but the AIPs felt staged, too obviously tongue in cheek, and their Victorian heroes wore buzz cuts. The Hammers faked the period better. 

Between British bands, J.G.Ballard and Hammer Films, I used to think England was the coolest place on Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one? Hammer, 60s, is my comfort zone. I grew up loving the Universals on TV, and seeing the Hammer double-bills as they came out was the perfect next step. Great atmosphere, wonderful sets, beautifully shot. A little blood, Peter Cushing’s weapon-like cheekbones, and oceans of cleavage. I also liked the Italian gothics of the era, but the AIPs felt staged, too obviously tongue in cheek, and their Victorian heroes wore buzz cuts. The Hammers faked the period better. </p>
<p>Between British bands, J.G.Ballard and Hammer Films, I used to think England was the coolest place on Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARBOGAST</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75520</link>
		<author>ARBOGAST</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75520</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;To men, watching a grainy 70s flick is like a warm blanket… &lt;/i&gt;

... that smells like pussy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To men, watching a grainy 70s flick is like a warm blanket… </i></p>
<p>&#8230; that smells like pussy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75541</link>
		<author>Kimberly</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75541</guid>
					<description>Been super busy this week and forget to send in my response, but it's probably pretty obvious that my favorite horror film eras are the '60s and '70s (Pierre, you're not alone!). I love the sixties a tiny bit more then the seventies due to the way that many filmmakers mixed gothic horror with modern themes. Roger Corman and the Hammer films are also my "comfort zone." Christoper Lee will always be my favorite Dracula (sorry Bela!). The early 70s was an amazing time for horror as well, but I got really bored with the slash and burn style that started taking over around 1975. The supernatural/gothic elements took a backseat and horror has never fully recovered from that, but every era produces some great films.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been super busy this week and forget to send in my response, but it&#8217;s probably pretty obvious that my favorite horror film eras are the &#8217;60s and &#8217;70s (Pierre, you&#8217;re not alone!). I love the sixties a tiny bit more then the seventies due to the way that many filmmakers mixed gothic horror with modern themes. Roger Corman and the Hammer films are also my &#8220;comfort zone.&#8221; Christoper Lee will always be my favorite Dracula (sorry Bela!). The early 70s was an amazing time for horror as well, but I got really bored with the slash and burn style that started taking over around 1975. The supernatural/gothic elements took a backseat and horror has never fully recovered from that, but every era produces some great films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borehole</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75766</link>
		<author>borehole</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-75766</guid>
					<description>I'd like to put in a kind word for "now."

I love the Universal stuff, appreciate Hammer and its imitators (without really enjoying them per se), genuflect before Romero's reinvention of the genre and the 70s school of hyperreal-horror-as-political-message-delivery-device that grew out of it, and I left my heart in the 80s (grainy fim stock, minimalist synth, and rubbery FX in service of a good story equals awesome; if the story sucks, there's still plenty of fun to be had).

All that said, I've been blown away by the decade so far (we should probably come up with a name for it before it's over). I guess that's because today's filmmakers tend to be right around my own age, so my cherished memories are their professional influences. Yeah, we're still talking about 1 good flick for every 20 crappy ones, but such is film.

Geez, until I saw this post I forgot how much the 50s and 90s sucked. Tranquility has its upside, to be sure, but it kills our genre dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to put in a kind word for &#8220;now.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love the Universal stuff, appreciate Hammer and its imitators (without really enjoying them per se), genuflect before Romero&#8217;s reinvention of the genre and the 70s school of hyperreal-horror-as-political-message-delivery-device that grew out of it, and I left my heart in the 80s (grainy fim stock, minimalist synth, and rubbery FX in service of a good story equals awesome; if the story sucks, there&#8217;s still plenty of fun to be had).</p>
<p>All that said, I&#8217;ve been blown away by the decade so far (we should probably come up with a name for it before it&#8217;s over). I guess that&#8217;s because today&#8217;s filmmakers tend to be right around my own age, so my cherished memories are their professional influences. Yeah, we&#8217;re still talking about 1 good flick for every 20 crappy ones, but such is film.</p>
<p>Geez, until I saw this post I forgot how much the 50s and 90s sucked. Tranquility has its upside, to be sure, but it kills our genre dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warren @ 150 days</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-76087</link>
		<author>warren @ 150 days</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-76087</guid>
					<description>The 70's!!!

Hate the 90's yet I continue to be fascinated with the early 90's horror that killed off 80's horror.

This past year, 2007, was particularly bad with me not liking a single theatrical release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 70&#8217;s!!!</p>
<p>Hate the 90&#8217;s yet I continue to be fascinated with the early 90&#8217;s horror that killed off 80&#8217;s horror.</p>
<p>This past year, 2007, was particularly bad with me not liking a single theatrical release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horror Grinder Horror Movies Horror Books Horror News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Horror Roundtable Week Eighty-Four</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-76374</link>
		<author>Horror Grinder Horror Movies Horror Books Horror News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Horror Roundtable Week Eighty-Four</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-76374</guid>
					<description>[...] first by The Horror Blog   Social Bookmarking: Scream as loud as you can! Maybe someone will hear. These icons link to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] first by The Horror Blog   Social Bookmarking: Scream as loud as you can! Maybe someone will hear. These icons link to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blueroskiller</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-77209</link>
		<author>Blueroskiller</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/02/01/horror-roundtable-week-eighty-four/#comment-77209</guid>
					<description>I'm right there with Borehole in saying NOW.

Not because the majority of films made &#38; released today are better than the high water marks of those classic eras of the past ( though there have been a LOT of excellent genre films released over the course of the past several years ), but because we have such an unprecedented variety of ways to see so many of our favs, both old &#38; new, in their best possible incarnations.

Think about how recently it was that we were limited to whatever it was that was shown on our local stations. Then, even with the advent of cable television &#38; the VCR, we were stuck with often grainy, subpar prints either broadcast or released on horribly pan &#38; scanned tapes. All of which we gladly accepted because the alternative was even GRAINIER or muddier bootlegs that we grossly overpaid for. Again, gladly, because the alternative was not seeing these obscure, usually foreign horror films that we'd been reading about in magazines &#38; books for years.
I shudder to think of how much money I spent lining the pockets of a certain genre mag editor/author/T-shirt entrepreneur who shall go nameless  for the opportunity to build a near complete bootleg collection of uncut Argento flicks &#38; Paul Naschy's wolfman movies.
All of which were always advertised in his mailings as "pristine copies from a Japanese laserdisc source" (LOL!). And ALL of which instantly went into the trash upon their legit release during the DVD revolution.
Not that I hold any grudges, though all of VERY suspect "first generation" status, those old bootlegs served their purpose for a few years, allowing me to see films that I otherwise wouldn't have until years later. Sort of an appetizer for the "real release" on DVD a few years afterward.

But, back to the subject at hand, now many of our favs are not only readily available on DVD in their preferred forms, but also in spectacular HD versions via disc and/or on cable or satellite. 

In my making a case for NOW as my favorite era for the genre film, I'm standing on the fact that we now have a greater array of films, pretty much instantly available to us in their best possible quality than we'd have ever dared dream about just a decade ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m right there with Borehole in saying NOW.</p>
<p>Not because the majority of films made &amp; released today are better than the high water marks of those classic eras of the past ( though there have been a LOT of excellent genre films released over the course of the past several years ), but because we have such an unprecedented variety of ways to see so many of our favs, both old &amp; new, in their best possible incarnations.</p>
<p>Think about how recently it was that we were limited to whatever it was that was shown on our local stations. Then, even with the advent of cable television &amp; the VCR, we were stuck with often grainy, subpar prints either broadcast or released on horribly pan &amp; scanned tapes. All of which we gladly accepted because the alternative was even GRAINIER or muddier bootlegs that we grossly overpaid for. Again, gladly, because the alternative was not seeing these obscure, usually foreign horror films that we&#8217;d been reading about in magazines &amp; books for years.<br />
I shudder to think of how much money I spent lining the pockets of a certain genre mag editor/author/T-shirt entrepreneur who shall go nameless  for the opportunity to build a near complete bootleg collection of uncut Argento flicks &amp; Paul Naschy&#8217;s wolfman movies.<br />
All of which were always advertised in his mailings as &#8220;pristine copies from a Japanese laserdisc source&#8221; (LOL!). And ALL of which instantly went into the trash upon their legit release during the DVD revolution.<br />
Not that I hold any grudges, though all of VERY suspect &#8220;first generation&#8221; status, those old bootlegs served their purpose for a few years, allowing me to see films that I otherwise wouldn&#8217;t have until years later. Sort of an appetizer for the &#8220;real release&#8221; on DVD a few years afterward.</p>
<p>But, back to the subject at hand, now many of our favs are not only readily available on DVD in their preferred forms, but also in spectacular HD versions via disc and/or on cable or satellite. </p>
<p>In my making a case for NOW as my favorite era for the genre film, I&#8217;m standing on the fact that we now have a greater array of films, pretty much instantly available to us in their best possible quality than we&#8217;d have ever dared dream about just a decade ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
