<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Horror Roundtable Week Ninety-Nine</title>
	<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/</link>
	<description>Better Living Through Terror</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: HP</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-101644</link>
		<author>HP</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-101644</guid>
					<description>"art or entertainment that changed the genre," eh?

How about the one-two punch of Dracula and Frankenstein in 1931. Outside of European (and especially German) Expressionism, it seems to me that these two movies made it possible to make movies for mainstream audiences in which the supernatural horror is, within the context of the film, real.  The previous reams of "Old Dark House/Scooby-Doo-ending movies would meet the public's need for  scares, but pull their punches at the end with a contrived "rational" explanation. Dracula and Frankenstein made it possible to present movies to mainstream (American?) audiences where the ghosts and monsters are revealed in the end to be ... ghosts and monsters.

I'd also give props to Richard Matheson's original novel I Am Legend (despite the various indignities heaped on it by three generations of filmmakers). Sure, there are antecedents, but I Am Legend made "daylight horror" a commercial possibility. Prior to I Am Legend, almost all horror strived for the Gothic sensibility -- age, decay, and degeneracy. Personally, I'd rather watch or read a gothic than a daylight horror any day, but the fact remains, no I Am Legend means no Stephen King or Peter Straub or Clive Barker, no NotLD, no gialli, no slashers, no sexy urban vampires. Almost everything we think of when we think of horror since 1960 comes out of I Am Legend.

I think Val Lewton probably deserves mention, too. He made intelligent horrors that appealed to adults (and especially, women), he provided an outlet for wartime anxiety, and, for good or ill, he invented the jump scare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;art or entertainment that changed the genre,&#8221; eh?</p>
<p>How about the one-two punch of Dracula and Frankenstein in 1931. Outside of European (and especially German) Expressionism, it seems to me that these two movies made it possible to make movies for mainstream audiences in which the supernatural horror is, within the context of the film, real.  The previous reams of &#8220;Old Dark House/Scooby-Doo-ending movies would meet the public&#8217;s need for  scares, but pull their punches at the end with a contrived &#8220;rational&#8221; explanation. Dracula and Frankenstein made it possible to present movies to mainstream (American?) audiences where the ghosts and monsters are revealed in the end to be &#8230; ghosts and monsters.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also give props to Richard Matheson&#8217;s original novel I Am Legend (despite the various indignities heaped on it by three generations of filmmakers). Sure, there are antecedents, but I Am Legend made &#8220;daylight horror&#8221; a commercial possibility. Prior to I Am Legend, almost all horror strived for the Gothic sensibility &#8212; age, decay, and degeneracy. Personally, I&#8217;d rather watch or read a gothic than a daylight horror any day, but the fact remains, no I Am Legend means no Stephen King or Peter Straub or Clive Barker, no NotLD, no gialli, no slashers, no sexy urban vampires. Almost everything we think of when we think of horror since 1960 comes out of I Am Legend.</p>
<p>I think Val Lewton probably deserves mention, too. He made intelligent horrors that appealed to adults (and especially, women), he provided an outlet for wartime anxiety, and, for good or ill, he invented the jump scare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve Tushnet</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-101816</link>
		<author>Eve Tushnet</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 00:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-101816</guid>
					<description>Since I know virtually nothing about the history of the genre, I'll just say that Val Lewton's work has been reissued on dvd with terrific commentary tracks, and IT IS SO AWESOME. "The Seventh Victim," while hardly my favorite of his movies, is horror-as-noir, with tons of scenes whose echoes can be heard in "Psycho," "Rosemary's Baby," &#38; lots of other flicks; his haunting, hyperemotional and explicitly psychological style seems also like a transitional moment away from the old expressionist-influenced horrors. (Predictably, my favorite might be the most expressionist-looking one, "I Walked with a Zombie.")</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I know virtually nothing about the history of the genre, I&#8217;ll just say that Val Lewton&#8217;s work has been reissued on dvd with terrific commentary tracks, and IT IS SO AWESOME. &#8220;The Seventh Victim,&#8221; while hardly my favorite of his movies, is horror-as-noir, with tons of scenes whose echoes can be heard in &#8220;Psycho,&#8221; &#8220;Rosemary&#8217;s Baby,&#8221; &amp; lots of other flicks; his haunting, hyperemotional and explicitly psychological style seems also like a transitional moment away from the old expressionist-influenced horrors. (Predictably, my favorite might be the most expressionist-looking one, &#8220;I Walked with a Zombie.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-101968</link>
		<author>Final Girl</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-101968</guid>
					<description>Gah!  Dammit, I forgot about this one, as per usual.  These are some fantastic answers, though- I really love Lancifer's response.  Props to F13!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah!  Dammit, I forgot about this one, as per usual.  These are some fantastic answers, though- I really love Lancifer&#8217;s response.  Props to F13!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miru</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-102417</link>
		<author>Miru</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-102417</guid>
					<description>Not that I particularly enjoyed this remake or any of the remakes, but THE RING has prompted numerous American interpretations of Japanese horror classics. The shaky camera angles, dark visuals, fright tactics, and little scary asian kids are found in almost every PG13 horror movie today. Although, it would be funny for hollywood to try to tame and remake any of Miike's movies lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I particularly enjoyed this remake or any of the remakes, but THE RING has prompted numerous American interpretations of Japanese horror classics. The shaky camera angles, dark visuals, fright tactics, and little scary asian kids are found in almost every PG13 horror movie today. Although, it would be funny for hollywood to try to tame and remake any of Miike&#8217;s movies lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Allard</title>
		<link>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-102651</link>
		<author>Jeff Allard</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 12:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thehorrorblog.com/2008/05/16/horror-roundtable-week-ninety-nine/#comment-102651</guid>
					<description>The above answers have already covered plenty of ground but how about the original CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON? The Gill-Man may not have been the very first instance of a man in a monster suit but he was the standard setter and this movie made the world safe for every rubber-suited monster since - from Godzilla to H.R. Giger's Alien to the Predator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above answers have already covered plenty of ground but how about the original CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON? The Gill-Man may not have been the very first instance of a man in a monster suit but he was the standard setter and this movie made the world safe for every rubber-suited monster since - from Godzilla to H.R. Giger&#8217;s Alien to the Predator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
